Bills Aimed At Controversial Dallas-Houston Bullet Train Sail Out Of Senate Committee | KERA News

Bills Aimed At Controversial Dallas-Houston Bullet Train Sail Out Of Senate Committee

Apr 5, 2017

The Texas Senate's transportation committee committee sent to the full Senate on Wednesday five high-speed train bills, some of which could impact or hinder a private company's plans to build a bullet train from Dallas to Houston.

The bills collectively would prevent lawmakers from allocating any state funds to the controversial project, require Texas Central Partners to build the line in a way that would allow multiple types of trains to run on it and force the company to offer land acquired for the project back to the previous property owners if the project doesn’t come to fruition.

At Wednesday's hearing, several senators on the Senate Transportation Committee and a group that formed in opposition to Texas Central's project portrayed the legislation as protections for taxpayers and landowners.

“They offer sensible regulation,” said Ben Leman, chairman of Texans Against High-Speed Rail.

But Texas Central, the company building the 240-mile line, said some of the bills unfairly target only the firm's project. And a rail advocacy group said the bills discriminate against a potential new mode of transportation in a car-centric state that perpetually struggles with urban road congestion.

“This is a belt that would bind the state in ways that I think would foreclose innovation and are not directed specifically at the Texas Central project,” said Chris Lippincott, executive director of Texas Rail Advocates.

The five bills are among more than 20 pieces of legislation aimed at privately-operated high-speed rail in Texas that lawmakers have filed this session. All five also have House companions that have yet to be heard in that chamber’s committees.

Texas Central plans to build a line from downtown Dallas to northwest Houston within the next several years. It promises to speed passengers between the two cities in 90 minutes on train cars that travel up to 205 mph. It has also vowed not to take any state funds for the project, though it may apply for some federal loans. The project has drawn strong support from officials in Dallas and Houston while whipping up opposition from people in largely rural communities along the route.

One of the biggest points of contention surrounding the project is Texas Central’s claim that it can use eminent domain to obtain property for the project. Some opponents disagree with how the company interprets state law regarding private railroad companies that are allowed to condemn and buy land for public uses. But the company is standing by its assertion.

“When anybody takes your land, that’s a high order,” said state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham.

Senate Bill 979 originally would have prevented any privately operated high-speed rail company from using eminent domain. But state Sen. Charles Schwertner, R-Georgetown, removed that provision in a version of the bill presented Wednesday morning. The bill still requires a company that takes land under the “threat” of eminent domain for a high-speed rail project must return the land to the previous owners if the project isn’t eventually built.

The bill passed out of the committee unanimously. 

Schwertner authored two of the other bills passed Wednesday. Senate Bill 977would forbid lawmakers from allocating any state funds to a privately operated high-speed rail project. It would also prohibit any state agencies from using state money on the planning, construction or operation of a bullet train line.

Schwertner’s wording on that provision of the bill is similar to a provision in the Senate’s proposed budget that he wrote. Texas Central called that budget wording a “job killer” that would create “vague and ambiguous questions” about its ability to coordinate and work with the Texas Department of Transportation, which is helping shepherd the project through the federal approval process.

But Schwertner on Wednesday presented a memo from TxDOT government affairs director Jerry Haddican. The letter said the state agency should still be able to answer questions from Texas Central, review and provide advice on the company’s plans and build state roads and highways that connect to development around high-speed rail stations under Schwertner's budget rider.

Texas Central president Tim Keith said Wednesday that the memo “was received well” after he “quickly” reviewed a copy of it but the company did not formally change its position on Schwertner's bill.

State Sen. Sylvia Garcia, D-Houston, cast the sole dissenting vote against that bill.

Kolkhorst’s Senate Bill 981 would require Texas Central's line to allow for more than one type of train technology. Texas Central currently only plans to allow for one type of train on its tracks. It is partnering with Central Japan Railway, the company the developed the technology for the Shinkansen bullet trains that run throughout Japan, for the Texas line.

Kolkhorst said her bill is aimed at preventing a monopoly, especially if the line is expanded to other cities inside or outside of Texas.

“This allows a more comprehensive network to be developed and allows train operators to purchase trains from a variety of manufacturers,” Kolkhorst said.

Keith said the line will physically fit other types of trains. But its signaling and safety systems will only be built to accommodate the bullet trains.

“The Japanese system is designed that way to avoid crashes,” said Holly Reed, a company spokeswoman. “That’s part of the safety system.”

Garcia again cast the sole dissenting vote against Kolkhorst’s bill.

The transportation committee also unanimously passed out Senate Bill 975, which would require high-speed rail operators to reimburse law enforcement agencies for any officers’ time used. The committee also passed Senate Bill 980, which would prohibit any privately operated high-speed rail line from receiving state money or loans unless the state first puts a lien on the project or receives a security interest in it. Garcia also cast the sole dissenting vote on that bill.

The Texas Tribune provided this story